High schools ban cyber bullies

This is from the June 13, 2012 edition. Subscribers read this a week ago in the dead tree version. Click here to subscribe.

Click here to like us on Facebook.

By Elaine Weinreb
Press Staff Writer

Local teens who use the internet to bully or harass others may find themselves in trouble with their school.
The Northern Humboldt Union High School District is adopting a policy that prohibits “harassing, teasing, intimidating, threatening or terrorizing another student or staff member by way of any technological tool, such as sending an inappropriate or derogatory email message, telephone message, instant message, test message, digital picture or image or website posting including a… blog.”
Students are prohibited from accessing social networking sites while using school computers, and the school district is blocking access to such sites “to the extent possible.”
The two-page long policy was part of a lengthy packet of related policies prohibiting other types of harassment, intimidation, and discrimination.
Language was added that also makes bullying prohibited even if it occurs outside the regular school day if it subsequently affects school activities or school attendance.
Superintendent Kenny Richards said that students at all three of the district’s high schools had been victimized by “social drama” created by the inappropriate use of cell phones.
“It created a problem at the school,” he added. “Sometimes cyberbullying has to be addressed at the school level even though it happens outside.”
Asked how the administration could enforce behavior that occurs when school is not in session, Richards said that his role was to act as a peacemaker.
“You have to bring people together and say ‘You can’t say that about Sarah,’” he said. “If there’s a veiled threat, then it goes to a different level. You may have to use a counselor; maybe notify parents that somebody threatened your son or daughter over the phone.”
“It’s saying that any student who feels he’s harassed should immediately contact somebody,” commented board member Colleen Toste. “Or anybody that observes an incident.”
Board member Mike Pigg said that he had heard of students being verbally abused on cellphones and abused on Facebook.
Richardson added that threats could be reported to the Sheriff’s office if they occurred outside the school.
“We only want to get involved when it impacts the school,” commented Chris Hartley, the principal of Six Rivers Charter School. “If things come onto the school site that occurred on Facebook, now you’re disrupting the school environment.
“It’s the same as when kids used to call each other on the phone and have arguments on the phone on the landline, and come to school and the argument continues,” Hartley said. “You still have the responsibility to try to work it out, from the school’s’ perspective.”
“It’s evolving, and case law is being formed around it as we speak,” he added.
Unlike a private landline argument between two people, digital communications can easily be replicated and spread over a wide online community.
The board did not take any formal action on the policies.
The proposed policies will re-appear on the agenda at the board’s next meeting on June 26, satisfying a legal requirement for new policies to be “read” at two different meetings before adoption.
If the school district fails to adopt the cyberbullying policy before July 1, it could lose a 60 percent discount from Universal Services Schools and Libraries, an organization which subsidizes the cost of internet access to schools and libraries.
Northern Humboldt Union High School District policies already forbid discrimination or harassment based on gender, ethnicity, race, national origin, religion, color, disability, age, or sexual orientation.
The McKinleyville Union Elementary School District does not yet have an anti-bullying policy in place but is planning to adopt one in August.



Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “High schools ban cyber bullies

  1. Anonymous

    They should adopt a “stop giving a fuck about facebook” policy, in which if your lack of educational ability is hindered because of television…er….the internet, you are reminded that the internet is irrelevant\. The rule demonstrates adults acting like authoritarian teens themselves. What a child does outside of school is none of the school’s business, period. Social networking sites solicit these childrens’ participation in a manner designed to keep them mentally and socially engaged with the internet for life. Children should be free to be children on the internet. Instead, they are being instructed to take trite bullshit like namecalling on websites seriously.

    • "Henchman Of Justice"

      Yep; and, as if the schools have cured the “on-campus bullying”. More wasted time by elected school board dummies who seem to think that ink on paper makes a point…all the while, little Jimmy gets bullied at school….but hey, such is the backward thinking. Yet more reasons as to why computers may be banned from schools (too much effort to supply such problems that are counter-intuitive to the learning processes that are of benefit). Let children be children and learn the old fashioned way because as society apparantly advances with computers, the results show de-advancements in many areas that are critical to the development of a humanoid from birth to adulthood. Computers are ruining aspects of life for minors and adults. Adults claim love and care for computer aided benefits, but taking a look-see at the Facebooks and Twitters of the world, one should be aware it is and has always only been about greed (money and social power). – HOJ

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s