The McKinleyville Press is a weekly community newspaper published in McKinleyville, Calif. If you want to read about everything that’s going on, you’ll need to buy or subscribe to our print edition, which comes out every Tuesday. We’ll post a few articles, opinion pieces, photos, breaking news and occasional nonsense on this blog. For more information about the newspaper, visit www.mckinleyvillepress.com.
-
Recent Comments
Rose on Durham and Allen to wed! Mike Harvey on Durham and Allen to wed! Patricia Holladay on Durham and Allen to wed! Gardclearly on Board clears manager in embezz… Helen Bartolo Luther on Durham and Allen to wed!
5 Comments
March 13, 2008 at 11:22 pm
Glad to see some of your articles will be online.
March 14, 2008 at 9:35 pm
Yay! Jack! This is a GREAT idea.
March 20, 2008 at 10:42 am
The Press Blog has appeared at an important time in McKinleyville’s development. It provides a forum to discuss the upcoming changes due to increased population. I suggest readers take a look at the recent action the Arcata City Council has taken toward implementing an online public participation tool. They seem to be moving toward adding “Open City Hall” to their existing website. This feature will allow the public to access the agenda for the next meeting (most likely the Friday before the next Wednesday meeting) and submit comments to the Council members. The comments can simply be a no or yes, or the writer can elaborate, even attaching a YouTube video if desired. The time for comments is cut off the day of the Council meeting, with a detailed summary available for each member. This not only allows the members to get a larger cross-section of the public’s views, but it affords the public to participate in the democratic process from their homes. Many people do not have the time, or are inclined to attend the meetings. Maybe someday MCSD will be able to implement this tool. There is no set-up cost and the only fee is $50 for each agenda item selected for comments. Generally only the most contentious agenda items would be selected for inclusion. According to Robert Vogel of Peak Democracy in his presentation to the Council, Oakland and Berkeley have been testing this during the past two years. I would prefer to be able to participate from home without sitting through an MCSD meeting.
May 11, 2008 at 8:45 am
Hey, Jack—— Mckinleyville is up sheet creek , or I should say MCSD is putting sheet creek into the river, and most of us seem to have no clue. MCSD has failed in taking care of our wastewater for at least the last 10 years, and our new upgrade has gone bust because MCSD failed to construct and grow the vegetation correctly. Now the CA State wastewater cops are doing their thing. The North staff, and the legislators who made the laws, for our dilemma. Those who were at the April MCSD meeting can attest to this. I told the water board that this reaction is like a driver who fails to negotiate a well marked curve, and then blames the curve when he drives the car off the road. –I suggested that MCSD get someone who is well enough qualified in wastewater treatment and management that they can adequately negotiate the water quality permits. Everyone in the wastewater business knows that permits get more stringent as time goes on. That is the law the legislature made, the law society wants, and the law that is enforced by the water quality control board. There is ALWAYS a curve coming up in wastewater management, and the manager must be anticipating the curve rather than reacting to it after the fact.
I pointed out that if we have a MCSD boardmember who is also a State water board member, and who has to excuse himself regarding Mckinleyville wastewater issues because of this, he is worthless to us as either a MCSD boardmember or a water quality control board member. (We do have such a boardmember and this did happen at the April meeting) We elect people to our MCSD board to take care of our wastewater needs. By recusing himself, the elected boardmember leaves us with no-one in his position to help, and we and the rest of the board need all the help we can get!—I suggested that MCSD boardmembers be required to NOT be members of other boards (like water quality control board) which may obviously cause conflict of interest.
I pointed out that the reports to the MCSD board regarding the performance of the treatment plant have been confusing and sloppy, and I suggested that a format be used which is more transparent: so the Boardmembers (and ratepayers) will not be confused. I used MCSD reports from 2007 to show this confusion, and related my conversations with MCSD Boardmembers who confirmed that the reports were confusing to them.
I pointed out that if our treatment marshes are fixed and become functional, we can expect many, if not all, of the pollutants listed on our new permit to be adequately treated. I expressed concern that the MCSD (in their non-wisdom) would opt to build a new treatment plant rather than fix or expand their treatment marshes, which would be much less expensive. Again this worry relates to the fact that no one at MCSD knows anything about performance of treatment marshes, and they insist on making decisions based on this ignorance. I used data from other existing treatment marshes to show performance possibilities of MCSD treatment marshes. I used an early plan by the MCSD citizens committee for a 10 acre marsh system, which would treat the water much better than the system we ended up building—approximately 2 acres.
Well, this is a big problem for all of us who flush in Mckinleyville. I hope the bloggers and all the ratepayers can become aware of the situation , and that we all do what we can to get our sheet together regarding this. I am tired of pooping in the river. I do not see this as a technical problem, but rather a political or bureaucratic problem of some kind. I have 20 years experience building and remediating sewage treatment marshes, and can definitely help with the technical part of the solution. But I am baffled at how to help MCSD get functional again at the Board and staff level. How long has MCSD been distracted from the main chore (wastewater) by issues of personalities, power, and posturing?
Thanks for reading.
——–Curious, George Waller
November 4, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Please add a Search feature to the blog